AGENTIA
AI BaseAI Agents
08 · Orchestration

AI Agents

Reasoning loops that observe, plan, call tools, verify results, and maintain useful state over a task.

Academic pathway3 curated papersReadable formulas
Learning outcomes
  • Separate planning, acting, memory, and verification
  • Design safe tool contracts and bounded execution loops
  • Measure success beyond a single model response
Core equations · rendered for reading, not code
ReAct loop
Thought → Action(tool, input) → Observation → Thought

Interleaving reasoning with tool observations lets an agent adapt its plan to the world.

Deep study guide

A reusable technical reading framework for moving from vocabulary to working understanding. Use it alongside the formulas and papers below.

4-part knowledge map
01

Conceptual map

Reasoning loops that observe, plan, call tools, verify results, and maintain useful state over a task. Start by naming the representation, objective, and source of evidence in any system you study. This habit separates a useful model explanation from a list of buzzwords.

02

Technical reasoning

Use the learning outcomes as checks for understanding: Separate planning, acting, memory, and verification; Design safe tool contracts and bounded execution loops; Measure success beyond a single model response. For each claim, ask what assumptions make it true, what data it needs, and how it could fail.

03

Equations to implementation

Translate each equation into a small experiment before treating it as memorized knowledge. ReAct loop: Interleaving reasoning with tool observations lets an agent adapt its plan to the world.

04

Evidence and research practice

Read primary work with a repeatable lens: problem, method, data, measurement, limits, and what would change your mind. This section starts with “ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models”, “Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools”, “Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior”. Follow citations outward only after you can explain the central claim in your own words.

Build exercise

Implement a minimal example using ReAct loop; record inputs, outputs, and a failure case.

Evaluate exercise

Define a baseline, a success metric, a stress test, and the evidence required before you trust an improvement.

Extend exercise

Choose one paper from the library, reproduce a small claim, then write down the questions its evaluation leaves open.

Research library

Primary sources and peer-reviewed work to deepen this page.

Each card includes a summary and direct paper link
ICLR2022

ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models

S. Yao et al.

Interleaves verbal reasoning traces and actions so models can use external environments and tools.

#reasoning#tools
Read paper / source
NeurIPS2023

Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools

T. Schick et al.

Shows how language models can learn when and how to call APIs such as calculators and search.

#tool use#self-supervision
Read paper / source
UIST2023

Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior

J. S. Park et al.

Combines memory, reflection, and planning to produce believable long-horizon behavior in a simulated world.

#memory#simulation
Read paper / source
Continue your pathway