AGENTIA
AI BaseAI in Science
09 · Discovery

AI in Science

How learned representations accelerate scientific inference while preserving uncertainty, provenance, and experimental validation.

Academic pathway3 curated papersReadable formulas
Learning outcomes
  • Match scientific questions to prediction, inverse problems, or simulation
  • Track uncertainty and data provenance
  • Distinguish benchmark gains from scientific evidence
Core equations · rendered for reading, not code
Bayesian posterior
p(θ|D) ∝ p(D|θ) p(θ)

Combines a scientific prior with observed data to quantify uncertainty over hypotheses.

Deep study guide

A reusable technical reading framework for moving from vocabulary to working understanding. Use it alongside the formulas and papers below.

4-part knowledge map
01

Conceptual map

How learned representations accelerate scientific inference while preserving uncertainty, provenance, and experimental validation. Start by naming the representation, objective, and source of evidence in any system you study. This habit separates a useful model explanation from a list of buzzwords.

02

Technical reasoning

Use the learning outcomes as checks for understanding: Match scientific questions to prediction, inverse problems, or simulation; Track uncertainty and data provenance; Distinguish benchmark gains from scientific evidence. For each claim, ask what assumptions make it true, what data it needs, and how it could fail.

03

Equations to implementation

Translate each equation into a small experiment before treating it as memorized knowledge. Bayesian posterior: Combines a scientific prior with observed data to quantify uncertainty over hypotheses.

04

Evidence and research practice

Read primary work with a repeatable lens: problem, method, data, measurement, limits, and what would change your mind. This section starts with “Highly Accurate Protein Structure Prediction with AlphaFold”, “FourCastNet: A Global Data-driven High-resolution Weather Model”, “A Deep Learning Approach to Antibiotic Discovery”. Follow citations outward only after you can explain the central claim in your own words.

Build exercise

Implement a minimal example using Bayesian posterior; record inputs, outputs, and a failure case.

Evaluate exercise

Define a baseline, a success metric, a stress test, and the evidence required before you trust an improvement.

Extend exercise

Choose one paper from the library, reproduce a small claim, then write down the questions its evaluation leaves open.

Research library

Primary sources and peer-reviewed work to deepen this page.

Each card includes a summary and direct paper link
Nature2021

Highly Accurate Protein Structure Prediction with AlphaFold

J. Jumper et al.

AlphaFold2 predicts protein structures with accuracy close to experimental methods across a benchmark of targets.

#biology#structure
Read paper / source
arXiv2022

FourCastNet: A Global Data-driven High-resolution Weather Model

J. Pathak et al.

Uses neural operators to provide fast, high-resolution global weather forecasting.

#climate#forecasting
Read paper / source
Cell2020

A Deep Learning Approach to Antibiotic Discovery

J. M. Stokes et al.

Demonstrates a neural screening workflow that identified a structurally novel antibiotic candidate.

#drug discovery#biology
Read paper / source
Continue your pathway